Assessment in a Constructivist,
Technology-Supported Learning
Abstraction
From the conversation we
gather that some students:
- Memorize very much for the test.
- Study only for passing score and a passing grade.
The questions we raise
are: “Is it really bad to memorize for the test?” and is it not good to study
for a score and for a grade? The answer to both questions is a NO.
Authentic assessment is
most appropriate for the constructive classroom. Authentic assessment measures
collective abilities, written and oral expression skills, analytical skills,
manipulative skills, (like computer skills ) integration, creativity, and
ability to work collaboratively.
In authentic assessment,
students perform real world tasks, thus the word “authentic” assessment
includes performance or product assessment.
· You and
your students may develop a rubric. It can be a collaborative effort for both
of you- teacher and students- in line with the practice of self-assessment,
which is highly encourage. In fact with scoring rubric, standards are clearly
set at the beginning for you and your students.
· Assessment
in a technology-supported environment necessarily includes display of skillful
and creative use of technologies, old and recent, because that is what is
naturally expected of us in the real world, a technology-dominated world.
· In the 21
century, we need to be computer literate and fluent or we get lost or become
helpless.
· These
presentations need performance-based assessment or product assessment. It is a
direct assessment.
· We do not
test their computer and creative skills, their analytical and integrative
skills by way of a multiple-choice.
· A
technology-supported classroom maximizes the use of old and new technology,
students are expected to demonstrate learning with the use of both old and new
technology.
· Students
may use transparencies OHP to demonstrate the learned skill of topic
presentation.
This is process or
performance assessment. How do we assess of our students have learned the
constructivist’s way of thinking, behaving and living? The rubric for
understanding and improving meaningful environments.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento